Article Text
Abstract
Belgium has recently extended its euthanasia legislation to minors, making it the first legislation in the world that does not specify any age limit. I consider two strands in the opposition to this legislation. First, I identify five arguments in the public debate to the effect that euthanasia for minors is somehow worse than euthanasia for adults—viz, arguments from weightiness, capability of discernment, pressure, sensitivity and sufficient palliative care—and show that these arguments are wanting. Second, there is another position in the public debate that wishes to keep the current age restriction on the books and have ethics boards exercise discretion in euthanasia decisions for minors. I interpret this position on the background of Velleman's ‘Against the Right to Die’ and show that, although costs remain substantial, it actually can provide some qualified support against extending euthanasia legislation to minors.
- Euthanasia
- Children
- Decision-making
- End-of-life
- Paediatrics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Euthanasia requests, procedures and outcomes for 100 Belgian patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: a retrospective, descriptive study
- Against euthanasia for children: a response to Bovens
- The sensitivity argument against child euthanasia
- Nurses’ views on their involvement in euthanasia: a qualitative study in Flanders (Belgium)
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- Facing requests for euthanasia: a clinical practice guideline
- Are general practitioners prepared to end life on request in a country where euthanasia is legalised?
- What people close to death say about euthanasia and assisted suicide: a qualitative study
- Dealing with requests for euthanasia: a qualitative study investigating the experience of general practitioners
- Development of palliative care and legalisation of euthanasia: antagonism or synergy?