Article info
PDFNeuroethics
Cyborgs and moral identity
- Correspondence to: G Gillett Professor of Biomedical Ethics, University of Otago, Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand; grant.gillett{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz
Citation
Cyborgs and moral identity
Publication history
- Received April 21, 2005
- Accepted May 31, 2005
- First published January 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Transhumanism, medical technology and slippery slopes
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- The common premise for uncommon conclusions
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Visionary medicine: speculative fiction, racial justice and Octavia Butler's ‘Bloodchild’
- Alleviating the burden of malaria with gene drive technologies? A biocentric analysis of the moral permissibility of modifying malaria mosquitoes
- The person, the soul, and genetic engineering